Historical subscriber preview

See one portfolio, from holdings to morning review.

Walk through what it owns, why a holding is there, what changed, and what arrives by email. This real, simulated example uses records at least 14 days old.

Find a strategy to follow Compare the 50 strategies →

Historical public data · not today's allocation

One All Access subscription unlocks current portfolios across all 50 strategies. Following controls alerts. This preview does not save a portfolio, follow a strategy or send an email.

1 · What it owns and why

AI Infrastructure Scout

Targets recorded Oct 14, 2026, 7:02 AM ET. This is a simulated historical portfolio.

12 holdings · Planned percentages
Stock / cash	Target %	Why it’s included
NvidiaNVDA	12%	I expect NVDA to keep the compute turbine turning: its 7.71% twenty-session gain and 31.61 P/E (share price compared with earnings) support a 12% core.Read full reasonHide full reason Recorded explanation · terminology clarified I expect NVDA to keep the compute turbine turning: its 7.71% twenty-session gain and 31.61 P/E (share price compared with earnings) support a 12% core. The close barely clears its average, so I refuse a full-throttle position. What would change the view: I'm wrong if that trend fails and compute demand weakens. Original explanation and evidence references I expect NVDA to keep the compute turbine turning: its 7.71% twenty-session gain and 31.61 P/E support a 12% core [NVDA-E9] [NVDA-E4]. The close barely clears its average, so I refuse a full-throttle position [NVDA-E3] [NVDA-E5]. I'm wrong if that trend fails and compute demand weakens.
BroadcomAVGO	11%	I expect AVGO's custom-silicon rail to carry more load because coverage reports an Alphabet agreement through 2031 and rising management AI revenue projections.Read full reasonHide full reason I expect AVGO's custom-silicon rail to carry more load because coverage reports an Alphabet agreement through 2031 and rising management AI revenue projections. Its 5.32% twenty-session gain supports an 11% allocation without chasing maximum capacity. What would change the view: I'm wrong if those projected revenues fail to materialize. Original explanation and evidence references I expect AVGO's custom-silicon rail to carry more load because coverage reports an Alphabet agreement through 2031 and rising management AI revenue projections [AVGO-E6]. Its 5.32% twenty-session gain supports an 11% allocation without chasing maximum capacity [AVGO-E8]. I'm wrong if those projected revenues fail to materialize.
MicrosoftMSFT	9%	I expect MSFT's cloud engine to pull more infrastructure demand through the grid: coverage reports Azure exceeding $100 billion annual revenue and development of Maia processors.Read full reasonHide full reason I expect MSFT's cloud engine to pull more infrastructure demand through the grid: coverage reports Azure exceeding $100 billion annual revenue and development of Maia processors. Its 9.32% twenty-session gain supports a 9% anchor. What would change the view: I'm wrong if cloud expansion stalls or custom-chip investment fails to earn its keep. Original explanation and evidence references I expect MSFT's cloud engine to pull more infrastructure demand through the grid: coverage reports Azure exceeding $100 billion annual revenue and development of Maia processors [MSFT-E7]. Its 9.32% twenty-session gain supports a 9% anchor [MSFT-E9]. I'm wrong if cloud expansion stalls or custom-chip investment fails to earn its keep.
Arista NetworksANET	8.5%	I expect ANET's switching pipes to collect infrastructure spending because coverage reports strong growth, substantial free cash flow and zero debt.Read full reasonHide full reason Recorded explanation · terminology clarified I expect ANET's switching pipes to collect infrastructure spending because coverage reports strong growth, substantial free cash flow and zero debt. I hold 8.5%, rather than overloading a network exposed to customer concentration and a 65.55 P/E (share price compared with earnings). What would change the view: I'm wrong if concentrated customers cut orders or profitability erodes. Original explanation and evidence references I expect ANET's switching pipes to collect infrastructure spending because coverage reports strong growth, substantial free cash flow and zero debt [ANET-E6]. I hold 8.5%, rather than overloading a network exposed to customer concentration and a 65.55 P/E [ANET-E3]. I'm wrong if concentrated customers cut orders or profitability erodes.
Hewlett Packard EnterpriseHPE	8.5%	I expect HPE's infrastructure part of the portfolio to retain momentum because its 68.81 close exceeds the 65.33 average and its twenty-session gain reaches 23.14%.Read full reasonHide full reason Recorded explanation · terminology clarified I expect HPE's infrastructure part of the portfolio to retain momentum because its 68.81 close exceeds the 65.33 average and its twenty-session gain reaches 23.14%. I keep the throttle at 8.5%; price strength alone cannot prove operating acceleration. What would change the view: I'm wrong if the trend breaks without stronger business confirmation. Original explanation and evidence references I expect HPE's infrastructure sleeve to retain momentum because its 68.81 close exceeds the 65.33 average and its twenty-session gain reaches 23.14% [HPE-E3] [HPE-E5] [HPE-E7]. I keep the throttle at 8.5%; price strength alone cannot prove operating acceleration. I'm wrong if the trend breaks without stronger business confirmation.
MetaMETA	8.5%	I expect META's AI advertising engine to help finance its infrastructure appetite: coverage says automation investment is producing stronger advertising results.Read full reasonHide full reason Recorded explanation · terminology clarified I expect META's AI advertising engine to help finance its infrastructure appetite: coverage says automation investment is producing stronger advertising results. Its 13.77% twenty-session gain supports an 8.5% demand-anchor part of the portfolio. What would change the view: I'm wrong if monetization stalls while the declining earnings expectations flagged in coverage persist. Original explanation and evidence references I expect META's AI advertising engine to help finance its infrastructure appetite: coverage says automation investment is producing stronger advertising results [META-E6]. Its 13.77% twenty-session gain supports an 8.5% demand-anchor sleeve [META-E8]. I'm wrong if monetization stalls while the declining earnings expectations flagged in coverage persist [META-E7].
Advanced Micro DevicesAMD	8%	I expect AMD to win more compute cargo because fresh coverage reports a Meta deal and agreements with OpenAI and Anthropic.Read full reasonHide full reason Recorded explanation · terminology clarified I expect AMD to win more compute cargo because fresh coverage reports a Meta deal and agreements with OpenAI and Anthropic. But a 172.52 P/E (share price compared with earnings) keeps this turbine at 8%, not its current 9.09%. What would change the view: I'm wrong if contract demand fails to convert into sustained earnings growth. Original explanation and evidence references I expect AMD to win more compute cargo because fresh coverage reports a Meta deal and agreements with OpenAI and Anthropic [AMD-E6]. But a 172.52 P/E keeps this turbine at 8%, not its current 9.09% [AMD-E3]. I'm wrong if contract demand fails to convert into sustained earnings growth.
DellDELL	7.5%	I expect DELL's server assembly line to convert more demand into earnings: fresh coverage reports a $95 billion AI-server backlog and 100% AI-server sales growth.Read full reasonHide full reason Recorded explanation · terminology clarified I expect DELL's server assembly line to convert more demand into earnings: fresh coverage reports a $95 billion AI-server backlog and 100% AI-server sales growth. I raise the part of the portfolio to 7.5%, with price above its average supporting deployment. What would change the view: I'm wrong if backlog conversion or earnings revisions deteriorate. Original explanation and evidence references I expect DELL's server assembly line to convert more demand into earnings: fresh coverage reports a $95 billion AI-server backlog and 100% AI-server sales growth [DELL-E5]. I raise the sleeve to 7.5%, with price above its average supporting deployment [DELL-E3] [DELL-E4]. I'm wrong if backlog conversion or earnings revisions deteriorate.
Super Micro ComputerSMCI	6%	I expect SMCI's systems engine to capture deployment growth because coverage projects substantial earnings and revenue expansion.Read full reasonHide full reason Recorded explanation · terminology clarified I expect SMCI's systems engine to capture deployment growth because coverage projects substantial earnings and revenue expansion. A 22.33 P/E (share price compared with earnings) supports ownership, but the reported estimate dip keeps this higher-torque part of the portfolio at 6%. What would change the view: I'm wrong if revisions keep slipping and anticipated growth fails to reach the loading dock. Original explanation and evidence references I expect SMCI's systems engine to capture deployment growth because coverage projects substantial earnings and revenue expansion [SMCI-E5]. A 22.33 P/E supports ownership, but the reported estimate dip keeps this higher-torque sleeve at 6% [SMCI-E3]. I'm wrong if revisions keep slipping and anticipated growth fails to reach the loading dock.
VertivVRT	6%	I expect VRT's electrical-equipment part of the portfolio to regain traction because coverage reports upward earnings revisions and positive earnings surprises.Read full reasonHide full reason Recorded explanation · terminology clarified I expect VRT's electrical-equipment part of the portfolio to regain traction because coverage reports upward earnings revisions and positive earnings surprises. I retain 6%, not more: its 237.29 close trails the 246.52 average and valuation is 57.73 times earnings. What would change the view: I'm wrong if revisions reverse while the price foundation keeps cracking. Original explanation and evidence references I expect VRT's electrical-equipment sleeve to regain traction because coverage reports upward earnings revisions and positive earnings surprises [VRT-E6]. I retain 6%, not more: its 237.29 close trails the 246.52 average and valuation is 57.73 times earnings [VRT-E3] [VRT-E5] [VRT-E4]. I'm wrong if revisions reverse while the price foundation keeps cracking.
MicronMU	5%	I expect MU's memory lane to benefit from AI demand and tight supply.Read full reasonHide full reason Recorded explanation · terminology clarified I expect MU's memory lane to benefit from AI demand and tight supply. But new coverage flags dependence on elevated memory prices, and the close trails its average. I cut the part of the portfolio to 5%. What would change the view: I'm wrong if pricing normalizes faster than demand can absorb the shock. Original explanation and evidence references I expect MU's memory lane to benefit from AI demand and tight supply [MU-E9]. But new coverage flags dependence on elevated memory prices, and the close trails its average [MU-E7] [MU-E4] [MU-E6]. I cut the sleeve to 5%. I'm wrong if pricing normalizes faster than demand can absorb the shock.
CashUSD	10%	No holding-specific reason was recorded.
Total	100%	Complete target portfolio

Target percentages show how the strategy plans to split its money. 10% means $10 out of every $100. These are historical simulated targets; actual holdings can differ.

Read the complete dated decision →

Inspect the simulated holdings snapshot

Snapshot: Oct 14, 2026, 3:30 PM ET. Public cutoff: Oct 14, 2026, 4:32 PM ET.

Holding	Snapshot weight
AMD	9.07%
ANET	8.63%
AVGO	10.68%
DELL	6.2%
HPE	7.25%
META	8.97%
MSFT	8.76%
MU	6.48%
NVDA	12.15%
SMCI	6.04%
VRT	5.96%
Cash	9.81%

Simulated return: -1.81% as of this snapshot. It is not today's return or a full benchmark comparison.

View the full performance record →

2 · What changed

MU: 6.3% → 5%

I expect MU's memory lane to benefit from AI demand and tight supply. But new coverage flags dependence on elevated memory prices, and the close trails its average. I cut the sleeve to 5%. I'm wrong if pricing normalizes faster than demand can absorb the shock.

View all 12 recorded target changes

Investment	Before	Target
MU	6.3%	5%
AMD	9.09%	8%
HPE	7.57%	8.5%
DELL	6.68%	7.5%
USD	9.35%	10%
MSFT	8.55%	9%
AVGO	10.58%	11%
META	8.88%	8.5%
SMCI	6.31%	6%
ANET	8.65%	8.5%
VRT	6.1%	6%
NVDA	11.95%	12%

Changes in a strategy do not automatically change your saved portfolio or place trades. Review the updates and decide what to keep.

Inspect the permanent record →

3 · What arrives in your inbox

See the change before deciding what to do.

Portfolio-change alerts show the strategy, its previous and new targets, and its recorded reasons. All Access includes optional change emails for strategies you follow.

Historical alert illustration · never sent. This on-page example uses the actual decision below. It compares recorded portfolio weights, not previous emails, and is not a screenshot of a delivered email.

Allocation Agents · Planned portfolio changes

AI Infrastructure Scout: portfolio update

Decision recorded Oct 14, 2026, 7:02 AM ET

MU: 6.3% → 5% target

Why: I expect MU's memory lane to benefit from AI demand and tight supply. But new coverage flags dependence on elevated memory prices, and the close trails its average. I cut the sleeve to 5%. I'm wrong if pricing normalizes faster than demand can absorb the shock.

View the complete before-and-after breakdown

Requested target changes · not completed trades. Change is measured in percentage points (pp).Swipe to see all columns →
Stock / cash	Before	Target	Change	Reason
NVDAIncrease target	11.95%	12%	+0.05 pp	I expect NVDA to keep the compute turbine turning: its 7.71% twenty-session gain and 31.61 P/E (share price compared with earnings) support a 12% core.Read full reasonHide full reason Recorded explanation · terminology clarified

4 · What you do next

Review the strategy. Decide whether to act.

Open this strategy’s portfolio to read its holdings and reasons. Follow it free to keep it in My Strategies. All Access adds current detail and optional change emails. You decide whether to trade through your own broker.

View this strategy’s portfolio →See All Access →

Want to combine strategies or change the percentages?

Portfolio Builder is optional. Save your own targets, then review changes when the strategies update. Your saved portfolio stays as it is until you save an update.

Try this strategy in Builder →Manual trade calculator AI-assisted review setup

Loading eligible historical records…

Simulated portfolios and returns. You decide independently whether and how to act. Allocation Agents does not connect to your broker, execute trades or personalize allocations. Returns are not guaranteed.